Pages Menu
TwitterRssFacebook
Categories Menu

Posted on Jul 31, 2011 in Biotechnology and IP, Gene Patents | 2 comments

US Court approves patenting of isolated human DNA

Not too long ago we had discussed, analysed and debated the patentability of human gene here, here , here and here. We also reported a proposed legislation to expressly exclude genetic patents in Australia. Just as we were beginning to drift away from the seemingly unending debate, this news from the US has summoned our curiocity.
Contrary to the contemporary policy of the USPTO and the prevailing US government’s stand on the matter, US Court of Appeals for Federal Circuit on Friday held that isolated human genes are patentable. Reversing the decision of the Court of first instance, the three member panel held that isolated human genes are significantly different from the genes in the body and so, the isolated DNAs can be patented. The verdict came in the Myriad Genetics’ lawsuit seeking patents on two genes to detect whether woman has an increased threat of getting breast cancer.
While several human rights activists are finding it shocking, the biotechnology industry is already smelling a radical change. Speaking for the three member panel  of the court that specialises in Patent matters, Judge Allen Lourie was reported to have stated that “The ability to visualize a DNA molecule through a microscope, or by any other means, when it is bonded to other genetic material, is worlds apart from possessing an isolated DNA molecule that is in hand and usable….”
While the Court of Appeal has temporarily cleared the cloud over gene patenting, the issue is most likely to be escalated to the US Supreme Court.
Image from Wikipedia

2 Comments

  1. Although a bit of trepidation is likely in order (no matter on what end of the spectrum you tend to fall), I look forward to reading what the SCOTUS has to say when the esteemed Justices opine on gene patents. Particularly since Myriad presents a bit of a chicken-and-egg question — that is thus perhaps not scientifically, definitively solvable — policy considerations will probably weigh heavily in their ultimate determination. Which also makes one wonder to what extent the Court’s new political makeup will affect the case’s outcome.

  2. While very many human rights activists are finding it sickening, the biotechnology industry is already smelling a communist change.

Post a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>